If your internal succession list looks like a roster of the most visible, outspoken, and quick-to-volunteer employees, you might be measuring stage presence instead of leadership performance. In many companies, internal hiring, succession planning, and High Potential (HiPo) identification unintentionally reward the people who emerge as leaders, not the ones who lead effectively. That mistake can inflate the cost of bad hires/promotes, slow development, and increase turnover at the management level. Ultimately hurting the business. 

‍

Emergence and effectiveness are not the same thing

‍

In hiring, emergence is the polished small talk, confident eye contact, and memorable story that dazzles the interview panel. Effectiveness shows up later in deeper behaviors like follow-through, coaching, clear standards, and sound decisions when people and numbers both matter. Presence in the room gets you noticed; consistent results on the scoreboard get you renewed. 

‍

Research consistently shows these are related but different outcomes. People who are more extraverted are more likely to be seen as leaders and to be nominated early. Yet the traits that predict sustained team results lean more toward conscientious execution, sound judgment, humility, and follow-through. A landmark meta-analysis on personality and leadership links extraversion to leadership ratings, while showing the broader Big Five pattern that ties effectiveness to a wider set of traits, not just visibility. 

‍

One striking example is narcissism/emotional stability. Another large meta-analysis found narcissism is positively related to leader emergence but not to leader effectiveness, with evidence that the emergence effect is largely explained by overlap with extraversion. In plain terms, people with swagger often get tapped first, but swagger alone does not produce better results.

‍

Summary of the core findings in leadership research

‍

1. Visibility bias: Traits linked to visibility such as assertiveness and social boldness drive nominations and early influence. That is emergence. 
2. Performance drivers differ: Traits such as conscientiousness, emotional stability, and openness to learning correlate with more durable leadership performance. That is effectiveness. 
3. Narcissism trap: Narcissism helps people get noticed but does not improve how teams perform. Effects are near zero for true effectiveness. 

‍

Why this breaks HiPo, succession, and internal hiring

‍

When organizations rely heavily on manager nominations, 9-box calibration driven by perception, or unstructured “leadership potential” discussions, they reward emergence signals. That can:

‍

• Misclassify potential: You end up promoting high visibility rather than high capability.
• Elevate turnover risk: Charisma without substance can degrade trust, drive engagement down, and raise regrettable exits.
• Reduce hiring ROI: Promoting or laterally placing the wrong manager increases the cost of bad hires and slows team performance improvement.
• Erode culture: Over-valuing presence over preparation encourages politics, not performance.

‍

Quick diagnostic: Are we over-indexing on emergence?

‍

• Our HiPo slate is dominated by strong talkers and heavy meeting contributors.
• We rely on open-ended nominations without structured criteria.
• We have few job-relevant assessments in our leadership pipeline.
• Promotion failures cluster around coaching quality, planning, or follow-through rather than visibility or presentation.

‍

The science-based fix: Separate how people get noticed from how they deliver results

‍

Q: How do validated hiring tools help us avoid the emergence trap?

‍
A: Validated hiring assessments measure job-relevant traits and abilities that link to real outcomes such as performance and turnover. Pairing personality measures with job fit assessments, situational judgment tests, and role-specific competencies helps you prioritize predictors of effectiveness instead of just presence. 

‍

Q: What is the simplest way to reduce early manager turnover?

‍
A: Use predictive hiring to align candidates to role demands and culture, then add structured interviews with behaviorally anchored questions. This combination filters out surface charm and rewards evidence of coaching skill, planning, accountability, and learning agility.

‍

A practical blueprint for HiPo and succession done right

‍

1) Define “effective” for the role.

‍
Start with job analysis and a competency model for frontline leadership, mid-level managers, and people leaders. Define “what good looks like” in behaviors and outcomes.

‍

2) Measure potential with multiple indicators.

‍

• Cognitive ability and learning agility for problem solving and scalability.
• Personality traits tied to manager competencies like accountability, composure, coachability, and drive.
• Situational judgment to sample job-relevant decision making.
• Past impact captured with structured behavioral evidence, not loose reputations.

‍

3) Link to performance

‍
Where possible, link assessment data to your performance data and promotions so you can confirm predictive hiring outcomes in your environment. That is how you maximize hiring ROI and fairness.

‍

4) Use structured calibration.

‍
Replace open nomination debates with a weighted scorecard that includes assessment results, performance data, and evidence of developing others. Use a common rubric to curb bias toward emergence.

‍

5) Monitor downstream outcomes.

‍
Track time to ramp, team engagement, retention, and performance of newly promoted leaders. Adjust your model as you learn.

‍

Metaphor: The spotlight and the scoreboard

‍

Emergence is the spotlight. It highlights who people notice first. Effectiveness is the scoreboard. It tells you who is actually winning games for the business. Great talent systems respect the spotlight, but they invest in the scoreboard.

‍

Evidence corner

‍

• Personality and leadership: Extraversion is a reliable signal of leadership emergence, while broad effectiveness relates to a fuller trait profile. 
• Narcissism and leadership: Narcissism shows a positive relationship with leader emergence, not with effectiveness. Overconfidence boosts promotion likelihood, but not objective results. 

‍

How ForPsyte implements this science inside your pipeline

‍

• Predictive, science-based hiring: Our pre-hire assessments combine personality, job fit, and situational judgment to focus on performance predictors, not popularity. We can integrate with structured interviews to keep quality high without slowing hiring. https://www.forpsyte.com/services/prehire-assessments
• HiPo and succession analytics: Our analytics solutions translate assessment insights into development plans and readiness indicators. We support localized validation so your model reflects your culture and roles. https://www.forpsyte.com/services/future-leader-analysis
• Local validation and fairness: We help clients tie assessment results to performance data in hiring to demonstrate predictive hiring outcomes and monitor fairness. 

‍

Common questions leaders ask

‍

How do validated assessments reduce employee turnover?

‍
They improve job fit and manager quality, which reduces early attrition tied to poor coaching and misaligned expectations. When assessments are linked to performance data in hiring, you select people who are more likely to stay and succeed, not just stand out. 

‍

What signals should we stop over-valuing in HiPo reviews?

‍
Unstructured charisma, meeting airtime, and self-promotion. Replace these with structured evidence such as coaching outcomes, follow-through on cross-functional work, and assessment indicators of composure and accountability.

‍

Can we do this without slowing hiring?

‍
Yes. Short, validated hiring assessments and structured interviews can maintain speed while lifting quality. By ultimately reducing turnover through increased job fit reducing the overall time spent on hiring. 

‍

Action checklist

‍

• Clarify the top behaviors that define effective leadership for each level.
• Add a predictive hiring step that measures personality and decision making for manager roles.
• Develop a weighted HiPo scorecard that blends assessment results with performance to identify potential and drive coaching/development focus.
• Validate locally by linking scores to team outcomes and promotion success.
• Train managers to use interview guides and development plans built from assessment results.

‍

Call to action

‍

Ready to upgrade your HiPo and succession decisions with science-based hiring? Book a short discovery session and see how ForPsyte’s assessment platform and validation studies can help you improve employee performance, reduce employee turnover, and build a bench that wins.

‍